<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perils, take 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasongriffey.net/wp/2004/04/12/perils-take-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasongriffey.net/wp/2004/04/12/perils-take-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:50:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://jasongriffey.net/wp/2004/04/12/perils-take-4/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibiblio.org/griffey/wp/?p=209#comment-308</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I forwarded a link to Jason&#039;s paper to the ALA Council mailing list with a few notes that I thought it was interesting, had some thoughtful things to say and received exactly zero [0] responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I forwarded a link to Jason&#8217;s paper to the ALA Council mailing list with a few notes that I thought it was interesting, had some thoughtful things to say and received exactly zero [0] responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://jasongriffey.net/wp/2004/04/12/perils-take-4/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibiblio.org/griffey/wp/?p=209#comment-307</guid>
		<description>re: bad faith

I didn&#039;t read the same intent (or the possibility of that intent) in the paper.  Maybe I give ALA too much benefit of the doubt, but I see the disconnect that Jason points out as being a function of ALA not being on the ball on the issues of copyright and open access.  It &lt;i&gt;looks&lt;/i&gt; hypocritical, but I wouldn&#039;t ascribe bad faith on ALA&#039;s part.  As I think I described it to Gorman: one hand doesn&#039;t seem to know what the other is doing.  And if I had to pin the motive for this on something, I would lay blame on organizational confusion and the lack of prioritization on this issue.  I think it does undermine ALA&#039;s overall position, but I don&#039;t believe that the org. is doing it on purpose or with ulterior/sinister motives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: bad faith</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t read the same intent (or the possibility of that intent) in the paper.  Maybe I give ALA too much benefit of the doubt, but I see the disconnect that Jason points out as being a function of ALA not being on the ball on the issues of copyright and open access.  It <i>looks</i> hypocritical, but I wouldn&#8217;t ascribe bad faith on ALA&#8217;s part.  As I think I described it to Gorman: one hand doesn&#8217;t seem to know what the other is doing.  And if I had to pin the motive for this on something, I would lay blame on organizational confusion and the lack of prioritization on this issue.  I think it does undermine ALA&#8217;s overall position, but I don&#8217;t believe that the org. is doing it on purpose or with ulterior/sinister motives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick Emrich</title>
		<link>http://jasongriffey.net/wp/2004/04/12/perils-take-4/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibiblio.org/griffey/wp/?p=209#comment-306</guid>
		<description>My apologies for the use of the phrase &quot;preordained conclusion,&quot; which in retrospect appears to imply bad faith on your part.  That was not my intent and I don&#039;t believe it is true.  And it is doubly ironic that it came up in the course of a discussion informed by my own concern that your report unjustly suggested ALA has acted in bad faith.  I look forward to seeing how the paper develops as you work through the issues at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies for the use of the phrase &#8220;preordained conclusion,&#8221; which in retrospect appears to imply bad faith on your part.  That was not my intent and I don&#8217;t believe it is true.  And it is doubly ironic that it came up in the course of a discussion informed by my own concern that your report unjustly suggested ALA has acted in bad faith.  I look forward to seeing how the paper develops as you work through the issues at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

